Bloom

Bloom v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20253:17-cv-02324California1,354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BLOOM, et al., Case No.: 17-cv-2324-AJB-DEB

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT

ENFORCEMENT

CITY OF SAN DIEGO,

14 Defendant. 15 [DKT. NO. 352] I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Enforcement of Settlement Agreement Re: Signs. Dkt. No. 352 (“Motion”). Plaintiffs’ Motion alleges the City of San Diego is in breach of the parties’ Settlement Agreement by failing to remove signs prohibiting vehicle habitation and oversized vehicle nighttime parking. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are a certified class of “[a]ll persons in the City of San Diego who . . . use or will use an RV or other vehicle as their only form of shelter at any time after November 15, 2017.” Dkt. 180 at 5. In the lawsuit that led to the Settlement Agreement at

27 1 The Court retained jurisdiction over the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.