D.T.

D.T. v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20253:24-cv-00304California2,858 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D.T., an individual, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00304-W-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING ORAL

v. MOTION AND ISSUING AMENDED

SCHEDULING ORDER

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; and

DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, [Doc. No. 19] Defendants. 16 17 18 Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Oral Motion to Extend Scheduling Order by 45 Days (“Motion”). Doc. No. 19. For the reasons stated below and based on the parties’ representations during the Status Conference, the Court GRANTS the Motion and ISSUES an Amended Scheduling Order. I. JOINT MOTION AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On November 25, 2024, the Court issued the initial Scheduling Order Regulating Discovery and Other Pre-Trial Proceedings. Doc. No. 15. On April 25, 2025, the Court held a Status Conference with the parties to check in on the progress of discovery. Doc. No. 18. At the Status Conference, the parties represented they have already completed extensive discovery,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.