D.T.
D.T. v. County of San Diego
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 D.T., an individual, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00304-W-VET
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING ORAL
13 v. MOTION AND ISSUING AMENDED
SCHEDULING ORDER
14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; and
DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 15 [Doc. No. 19] Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Oral Motion to Extend Scheduling Order by 45 20 Days (“Motion”). Doc. No. 19. For the reasons stated below and based on the parties’ 21 representations during the Status Conference, the Court GRANTS the Motion and ISSUES 22 an Amended Scheduling Order. 23 I. JOINT MOTION AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 24 On November 25, 2024, the Court issued the initial Scheduling Order Regulating 25 Discovery and Other Pre-Trial Proceedings. Doc. No. 15. On April 25, 2025, the Court 26 held a Status Conference with the parties to check in on the progress of discovery. Doc. 27 No. 18. At the Status Conference, the parties represented they have already completed 28 extensive discovery,…