Quintero

Quintero v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20253:24-cv-01141California2,104 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL R. QUINTERO, Case No.: 24-cv-1141-AJB (KSC)

CDCR #BN-3161,

12

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, 13 APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL vs. AND GRANTING SECOND 14

MOTION FOR EXTENSION

J. HILL, Warden, et al.,

15 OF TIME TO AMEND Defendants. 16 (Doc. No. 13) 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 21, 2024, the Court screened and 20 dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1), and granted him leave to amend on or before 22 January 6, 2025. (Doc. No. 9.) On December 9, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking a 23 90-day extension of time to amend. (Doc. No. 10.) On December 12, 2024, the Court 24 granted Plaintiff’s request, giving him until March 3, 2025, to file his Second Amended 25 Complaint. (Doc. No. 11). Plaintiff failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.