Quintero

Quintero v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20253:24-cv-01141California2,104 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL R. QUINTERO, Case No.: 24-cv-1141-AJB (KSC)

CDCR #BN-3161,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL vs. AND GRANTING SECOND

MOTION FOR EXTENSION

J. HILL, Warden, et al.,

OF TIME TO AMEND Defendants. 16 (Doc. No. 13) 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 21, 2024, the Court screened and dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1), and granted him leave to amend on or before January 6, 2025. (Doc. No. 9.) On December 9, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking a 90-day extension of time to amend. (Doc. No. 10.) On December 12, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request, giving him until March 3, 2025, to file his Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 11). Plaintiff failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.