Sanchez

Sanchez v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20253:24-cv-01591California708 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN SANCHEZ, Case No: 24-cv-01591-BAS-DDL

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

13 v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE

A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

14 DANIEL PARAMO, Warden; §§ 1915(e)(2) AND 1915A(b) AND CAMACHO, Correctional Officer; CDCR; 15 FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE IN JEFF MACOMBER, Secretary; DOES 1-

COMPLIANCE WITH COURT

16 20, Correctional Officers; DOES 21-50,

ORDER

Medical Staff; DOES 51-75, 17 Administrative Staff, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 In this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, pro se Plaintiff Juan 22 Sanchez alleged correctional officials at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility violated 23 his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated there in 2019. (See ECF No. 9-1 at 5‒ 24 8.) On January 15, 2025, the Court granted Sanchez’s motions for leave to proceed in 25 forma pauperis (“IFP”) and to amend his complaint but screened his amended pleading 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.