Shoup
Shoup v. JAG Welding, Fab & Services, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SHOUP, an individual, Case No.: 24-CV-1776 JLS (AHG)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND
14 JAG WELDING, FAB & SERVICES,
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
INC., a Texas Corporation, et al., 15 QUASH SERVICE PURSUANT TO Defendants. CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7.1(f)(3)(c) 16
17 (ECF No. 25) 18 19 20 Presently before the Court is Defendant JAG Welding, FAB & Services, Inc.’s 21 Motion to Dismiss the Unserved Defendants and Defendants Mike McQueen and Jessica 22 Cannon’s Motion to Quash Service and or Dismiss (“Mot.,” ECF No. 25). Plaintiff 23 Thomas Shoup did not file any response to the Motion. See generally Docket. On April 17, 24 2025, the Court took the Motion under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil 25 Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). ECF No. 26. Having carefully considered the arguments and the 26 applicable law, the Court GRANTS IN…