Newsom
(PC) Fenix v. Newsom
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVIN FENIX, No. 1:24-cv-00202-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DEFENDANTS’
13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE
14 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BE
GRANTED
15 Defendants. (ECF No. 37) 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to 20 exhaust the administrative remedies, filed February 14, 2025. 21 I. 22 BACKGROUND 23 This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s failure to protect claim against Defendants Miller, 24 Casaurang, and Soto. (ECF No. 24.) 25 On August 19, 2024, Defendants filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 29.) The 26 discovery and scheduling order was issued on October 18, 2024. (ECF No. 36.) 27 On…