Mohmand

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHELDON RAY NEWSOME, No. 2:23-cv-0151 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 F. MOHMAND, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 27, 2024, this action was dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to file a response 18 to defendant Mohmand’s motion to compel. The motion to compel was filed July 16, 2024. 19 After granting plaintiff two extensions of time to file a response, his response was due November 20 7, 2024. Despite being warned that a failure to respond would result in a dismissal of this action 21 (ECF No. 56), plaintiff neither filed a motion for an extension of time to respond, nor a response 22 to the motion itself. Plaintiff now asks that the court reconsider dismissal. Both parties have 23 consented to have all matters in this action before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 24 U.S.C. § 636(c). 25 A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) 26 or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County…