Woodburn

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DELEON LEE JOSEPH, No. 2:25-CV-0238-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 LINDY WOODBURN, and 15 Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On March 7, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to resolve the fee status for this case 20 within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to resolve the fee status may result in dismissal 21 of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local 22 Rule 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. 23 The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. 24 See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal 25 Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in 26 expeditious resolution of litigation; (2)…