Trump

(PS) Chiu v. Trump

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20252:25-cv-00704California1,365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAIFUSIN CHIU, No. 2:25-cv-0704 DJC AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DONALD TRUMP, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter accordingly was referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted. I. SCREENING A determination that a plaintiff qualifies financially for in forma pauperis status does not complete the inquiry required by the statute. The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.