Beckford

Beckford v. The Children's Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20253:24-cv-06468California1,786 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 AJA BECKFORD, et al., Case No. 24-cv-06468-CRB

9 Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

10 v.

RECONSIDERATION

11 THE CHILDREN'S GROUP, INC., 12 Defendant.

13 Defendant The Children’s Group (known as TCP) moves for reconsideration of the 14 Court’s order denying its motion to dismiss in light of the Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion in 15 Jones v. Starz Entertainment, LLC, 129 F.4th 1176 (9th Cir. 2025). Mot. (dkt. 46). For 16 the following reasons, the Court DENIES TCP’s motion. 17 I. LEGAL STANDARD 18 The Court has authority to reconsider and vacate its prior orders. See Fed. R. Civ. 19 P. 54(b); Civ. L.R. 7-9. Reconsideration is proper if (1) despite reasonable diligence on 20 behalf of the party moving for reconsideration, material facts or law were not presented to 21 the Court before entry of the order on which reconsideration is sought; (2) new material 22 facts arose or the relevant law changed after the order was entered; or (3) the Court 23 manifestly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.