James Harasch v. Martin O'Malley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES H.1, Case No. 2:24-cv-05631-GJS

Plaintiff

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v. ORDER

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking review of the denial by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) – sued through its Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) – of Plaintiff’s applications for Supplemental Security Income and Child’s Insurance Benefits. The parties filed briefs addressing the disputed issue in the case [Dkt. 11 and 14]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), both parties have consented to the undersigned for all purposes. [Dkt. 16.] The Court has taken the parties’ briefing under submission without oral argument. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that this matter should be affirmed. 26 27 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the first initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. …