James Harasch v. Martin O'Malley
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 JAMES H.1, Case No. 2:24-cv-05631-GJS
12 Plaintiff
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
13 v. ORDER
14 LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16
17 18 Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking review of the denial by the Social Security 19 Administration (“SSA”) – sued through its Acting Commissioner of Social Security 20 (“Commissioner”) – of Plaintiff’s applications for Supplemental Security Income 21 and Child’s Insurance Benefits. The parties filed briefs addressing the disputed 22 issue in the case [Dkt. 11 and 14]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), both parties have 23 consented to the undersigned for all purposes. [Dkt. 16.] The Court has taken the 24 parties’ briefing under submission without oral argument. For the reasons discussed 25 below, the Court finds that this matter should be affirmed. 26 27 1 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the first 28 initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 1 …