Lomboy

Lomboy v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20254:24-cv-04168California1,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RON LOMBOY, Case No. 24-cv-04168-HSG (LJC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE REQUEST FOR

ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Re: Dkt. No. 34 11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Ron Lomboy asserts that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. wrongfully terminated his employment and failed to accommodate his disability. Wells Fargo contends that it fired Lomboy for legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons, including Lomboy’s purported violation of Wells Fargo policies when he opened an account for a minor and purported false statements regarding such conduct. The parties filed a joint discovery letter brief (ECF No. 34) regarding Lomboy’s request to take more than the ten depositions allowed without leave of court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2) (“A party must obtain leave of court, and the court must grant leave to the extent consistent with Rule 26(b)(1) and (2) . . . if the parties have not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.