Vernell White v. Rob St Andre

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20258:24-cv-02678California482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 VERNELL WHITE, Case No. 8:24-cv-02678-SVW-SSC Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE ROB ST ANDRE, Warden, Respondent. 15 16 On December 9, 2024, pro se Petitioner Vernell White filed this habeas action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF 1.) On February 14, 2025, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition, arguing, in part, that the petition should be dismissed pursuant to the abstention rule of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 45–46 (1971) because Petitioner has a pending state appeal. (ECF 8.) On April 2, 2025, Petitioner filed a request to withdraw the petition without prejudice. (ECF 11.) Under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a petitioner may voluntarily dismiss a case without a court order before the respondent has served an answer or motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Voluntary dismissal under Rule only a motion to dismiss the petition. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.