Rodriguez-Merida

Rodriguez-Merida v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202524-2597California409 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEINER YESICA RODRIGUEZ- No. 24-2597 MERIDA; et al., Agency Nos.

A203-603-396

Petitioners, A203-603-397 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Geiner Yesica Rodriguez-Merida and her minor daughter, natives and

citizens of Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s decision denying

their applications for asylum and Rodriguez-Merida’s applications for withholding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of removal and protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.