Rocha
Rocha v. Fiedler
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202524-3692California766 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-3692
KAREL ROCHA; PRENOVOST
NORMANDIN DAWE & ROCHA, Adv. No. 23-02038 Appellants, BAP No. 23-1185 v.
MEGAN CHRISTINE FIEDLER, et al., MEMORANDUM*
Appellees.
Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit
Submitted April 10, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Karel Rocha and his law firm, Prenovost, Normandin, Dawe & Rocha, appeal
a Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) decision affirming the
bankruptcy court’s imposition of non-monetary sanctions under Federal Rule of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bankruptcy Procedure 9011. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We
affirm.