Rocha

Rocha v. Fiedler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202524-3692California766 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-3692

KAREL ROCHA; PRENOVOST

NORMANDIN DAWE & ROCHA, Adv. No. 23-02038 Appellants, BAP No. 23-1185 v.

MEGAN CHRISTINE FIEDLER, et al., MEMORANDUM*

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit

Submitted April 10, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Karel Rocha and his law firm, Prenovost, Normandin, Dawe & Rocha, appeal

a Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) decision affirming the

bankruptcy court’s imposition of non-monetary sanctions under Federal Rule of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bankruptcy Procedure 9011. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We

affirm.

We review “an award of sanctions for an abuse of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.