Murga-Lopez

Murga-Lopez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202523-3563California347 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA LILIA MURGA- No. 23-3563 LOPEZ; MARTIN ROMERO- Agency Nos.

REYES; JESUS EDUARDO ROMERO- A209-168-636

MURGA; OSCAR URIEL ROMERO- A209-168-675

MURGA,

A209-168-676

A209-168-637

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 4, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, WALLACH***, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. Petitioners are natives and citizens of Mexico. They petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.