Bondi

Flores Segura v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202524-2513California546 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC FRANK FLORES SEGURA; et al., No. 24-2513 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A241-710-469

A241-710-470

v.

A241-710-471

A241-710-472

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, A241-710-473 Respondent.

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Eric Frank Flores Segura, his wife, and their minor children, natives and

citizens of Peru, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.