Cruzado

Cruzado v. State of Washington

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202523-4451California347 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGEL LUIS CRUZADO, No. 23-4451 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-01474-JNW v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE OF WASHINGTON; SEATTLE

POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF

SEATTLE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Jamal N. Whitehead, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Angel Luis Cruzado appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process violations in the

December 2017 issuance and the December 2018 renewal of a civil domestic

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violence protection order by the King County Superior Court. We have

jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.