Cordova-Mejia

Cordova-Mejia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202524-1941California433 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDGAR ALEXANDER CORDOVA- No. 24-1941 MEJIA; et al., Agency Nos.

A209-296-914

Petitioners, A209-296-915

A209-297-160

v.

A209-297-161

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Edgar Alexander Cordova-Mejia, his two minor children, and his adult

stepson, Jairo Resiere Henrriquez-Castro, natives and citizens of El Salvador,

petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing

their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.