Nah

Nah v. Jablon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202523-4003California464 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAE S. NAH, No. 23-4003 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-06909-RGK-RAO Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

ANDREW V. JABLON; MYCHAEL E.

BYERTS; RESCH POLSTER & BERGER,

LLP; GENNADY LEBEDEV; ETHAN

MICHAEL; SAM HELMI; LM&H LAW

FIRM; BRIAN HUH, President CEO of Royal Printex Inc. and Royal Textile print Inc.; ROYAL TEXTILE PRINT

INC.; ROYAL PRINTEX INC.; ANDREW

KIM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jae S. Nah appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.