Nah
Nah v. Jablon
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAE S. NAH, No. 23-4003 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-06909-RGK-RAO Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
ANDREW V. JABLON; MYCHAEL E.
BYERTS; RESCH POLSTER & BERGER,
LLP; GENNADY LEBEDEV; ETHAN
MICHAEL; SAM HELMI; LM&H LAW
FIRM; BRIAN HUH, President CEO of Royal Printex Inc. and Royal Textile print Inc.; ROYAL TEXTILE PRINT
INC.; ROYAL PRINTEX INC.; ANDREW
KIM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2025**
Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jae S. Nah appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing…