Lee v. amazon.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202523-3132California314 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BEOM SU LEE, No. 23-3132 D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01090-RAJ Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

AMAZON.COM, INC., doing business as Amazon.com,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Beom Su Lee appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

his copyright infringement action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We review de novo. Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San Diego, 670

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 957, 970 (9th Cir. 2011) (cross-motions for summary judgment);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.