Davis

Davis v. Hutcheson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202523-2419California303 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DON ANGELO DAVIS, No. 23-2419 D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00077-DJC-DMC Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

R HUTCHESON; MATTHEWS, Unit Housery Officer; High Desert State Prison; MARION SPEARMAN, Warden; High Desert State Prison; RALPH DIAZ, Office of the Secretary; C.D.C.R,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Don Angelo Davis appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a First

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Amendment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.