Progressive Choice Insurance v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau

Good Law
160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 662·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 642·218 Cal. App. 4th 1145·2013 WL 4067918
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2013B242429California3,870 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manella, J.

INTRODUCTION

This case concerns the allocation of an underinsured motorist (UIM) loss between two automobile insurance companies. The insured was covered by automobile insurance policies issued by Progressive Choice Insurance Company (Progressive) and California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau (CSAA). He was injured in an automobile accident caused by a UIM. After settling with the UIM, the insured claimed a $62,500 loss under the UIM provisions of both policies. Progressive paid the entire claim, and sought contribution from CSAA. Progressive contended that under Insurance Code section 11580.2, subdivision (d), the UIM loss should be allocated on a pro rata basis between the two companies. The trial court agreed and granted summary judgment in favor of Progressive. CSAA contends the trial court erred, as under section 11580.2, subdivision (c)(2), its policy does not apply because the insured was covered by the Progressive policy; thus, the entire loss should be borne by Progressive. On appeal, Progressive contends CSAA may not rely on section 11580.2, subdivision (c)(2) because the CSAA policy lacked the necessary language to invoke that statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.