Marriage of Kahdeman CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 28, 2013B243812California2,127 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 8/28/13 Marriage of Kahdeman CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re the Marriage of RICHARD J. and 2d Civil No. B243812 DIANE CLARE KAHDEMAN. (Super. Ct. No. SD 011277) (Ventura County)

RICHARD J. KAHDEMAN,

Appellant,

v.

DIANE CLARE KAHDEMAN,

Respondent.

In 1993 appellant Richard J. Kahdeman and respondent Diane Clare Kahdeman ended their marriage. A decade later they returned to court to resolve their respective interests in Richard's Wells Fargo Retirement Annuity (Annuity).1 The trial court awarded each party a 50 percent interest in the Annuity and left it to the parties to resolve the language of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) consistent with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.