The People v. Ingram CA4/2

DISCUSSION

Defendant timely appealed from the trial court’s denial of resentencing and, upon

his request, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under

the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967)

386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts and potential

arguable issues, and requesting this court conduct an independent review of the record.

The only arguable issue presented by defendant’s counsel was whether the trial court

erred by denying defendant’s petition for resentencing pursuant to section 1170.126.

Robbery is a serious felony. (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(19).) Accordingly, defendant is

not eligible for resentencing pursuant to section 1170.126, subdivision (f).

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he

has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we

have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable issues.

3

III

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

RICHLI

Acting P. J. We concur:

KING

J.

CODRINGTON

J.

4