In re Ryan P. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2013A135485California2,293 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Filed 8/27/13 In re Ryan P. CA1/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re RYAN P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A135485

RYAN P.,

(Sonoma County Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. No. SJ09122675)

Ryan P. appeals from the order continuing his status as a ward of the juvenile court. He contends that one of the two allegations sustained by the court is not supported by substantial evidence. We conclude this contention is without merit. He also contends that four of the terms of his probation are constitutionally defective as overbroad or too vague. We agree in part, and also agree with the Attorney General that the infirmities are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.