The People v. Bullock CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2013E055532California4,751 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

After defendant Eric Vincent Bullock was involved in an accident with a truck on

State Route 60, a jury convicted him of two Vehicle Code offenses: driving under the

influence of alcohol causing injury and driving with a blood alcohol content of .08

percent or greater causing injury. (Veh. Code, § 23153, subds. (a) and (b).) The jury also

found defendant personally inflicted great bodily injury within the meaning of Penal

Code sections 12022.7, subdivision (a), and 1192.7, subdivision (c)(8).1 The court

sentenced defendant to six years in prison.

At the scene, defendant blamed the accident on his car being rearended by another

vehicle, forcing his car into the truck. At trial, defendant claimed his car had stalled,

causing him to lose control. On appeal, defendant makes four arguments: there was

insufficient evidence for his convictions because of the possibility of a mechanical

failure; the trial court erred by not instructing the jury regarding the defense of sudden

peril; there was prosecutorial error; and the trial court erred in imposing the upper term of

three years. We reject defendant‘s appeal and affirm the judgment.

II

STATEMENT OF FACTS

A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.