Carrillo
Carrillo v. Woodford CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Irion, J.
DISCUSSION
In processing the appeal, we noticed the restraining order expired by its own terms
on June 13, 2013. We solicited supplemental letter briefs from the parties on whether the
appeal is moot and should be dismissed. Neither party responded.
Under well-established principles, this appeal is moot and must be dismissed. "If
relief granted by the trial court is temporal, and if the relief granted expires before an
appeal can be heard, then an appeal by the adverse party is moot." (Environmental
Charter High School v. Centinela Valley Union High School Dist. (2004) 122
Cal.App.4th 139, 144.) "[A]ppellate courts as a rule will not render opinions on moot
questions: '[W]hen, pending an appeal from the judgment of a lower court, and without
fault of the [respondent], an event occurs which renders it impossible for [the reviewing
court] if it should decide the case in favor of [appellant], to grant [appellant] any effectual
relief whatever, the court will not proceed to a formal judgment, but will dismiss the
appeal.' " (Ebensteiner Co., Inc. v. Chadmar Group (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1174, 1178-
1179.) Since the restraining order challenged by Woodford has…