Smaili & Associates v. Rawag CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 2025G063767California764 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/28/25 Smaili & Associates v. Rawag CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

SMAILI & ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al.,

G063767

Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, (Super. Ct. Nos. 30-2018-00985248, 30-2018-01014873) v.

OPINION

SULEIMAN RAWAG,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, David J. Hesseltine, Judge. Dismissed. Suleiman Rawag, in pro. per., for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Cedar Adams and Adam K. Obeid for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents. * * *

THE COURT:

Appellant Suleiman Rawag hired respondents Smaili & Associates, P.C., and Jihad M. Smaili to represent him in connection with an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.