The People v. Strickland CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 28, 2013E058868California157 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. After examination of the

record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court to

independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant

filed a supplemental brief, which we have considered.

We have independently examined the record and have found no arguable issues.

Robbery is a violent felony. (§ 667.5, subd. (c)(9).) Robbery and attempted robbery with

the personal use of a firearm are serious felonies. (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) Accordingly,

defendant is not eligible for resentencing pursuant to section 1170.126, subdivision (f).

We are satisfied that defendant’s attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and

that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109-110; People v.

Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

McKINSTER J. We concur:

HOLLENHORST

Acting P. J.

MILLER

J.

4