The People v. Peralta CA4/1

FACTS

On July 28, 2012, Peralta, with another, personally transported methamphetamine.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below.

Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for

error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California

(1967) 386 U.S. 738. Counsel identifies as a possible, but not arguable, issue: whether

the trial court erred by imposing a $154 booking fee pursuant to Government Code

section 29550.1 without a finding of ability to pay.

We granted Peralta permission to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf, but

he has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no reasonably

arguable appellate issues, and Peralta has been competently represented by counsel on

this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

McDONALD, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

McINTYRE, J.

IRION, J.

2