The People v. Fort CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2013A135126California3,349 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 8/29/13 P. v. Fort CA1/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A135126

DAMAREA ANTHONY FORT,

(Solano County Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. No. FCR258669)

Defendant Damarea Anthony Fort appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss pursuant to Penal Code section 1389, California’s codification of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (hereinafter, IAD). Defendant challenges the trial court’s decision, contending he complied with the IAD in a manner sufficient to trigger invocation of its 180-day mandatory dismissal rule by mailing a handwritten letter from his Nevada prison to the District Attorney in Solano…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.