Rushing

Rushing v. Geissler CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2013A135764California1,700 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/29/13 Rushing v. Geissler CA1/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

OLLIE P. RUSHING,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A135764

v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG10536566) AMY LYNN GEISSLER et al.,

Defendants and Respondents. _________________________________/

Ollie P. Rushing (plaintiff) sued defendants Amy Lynn Geissler, Shyloui Jacquez Crooks, and Mason Securities Services, Inc. (collectively defendants) in propria persona for motor vehicle negligence. The court granted defendants’ nonsuit motion, concluding plaintiff failed to present sufficient admissible evidence to support the complaint’s allegations. It also dismissed the complaint as a terminating sanction for plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.