O'Donoghue

O'Donoghue v. Superior Court

Good Law
161 Cal. Rptr. 3d 609·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 695·219 Cal. App. 4th 245·2013 WL 4625505
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2013A137996California8,478 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jones, J.

In a commercial real estate transaction, Paraic O’Donoghue, Tony Manning, Enda G. Quigley, Sean Murphy, Daniel Walsh, and Christopher Flood (collectively defendants) each signed a separate personal continuing guaranty in favor of a lender. The guaranty agreements (agreements) contained a provision authorizing dispute resolution through judicial reference. (Code Civ. Proc., § 638.) In its action to enforce the agreements, Performing Arts, LLC (plaintiff), moved for appointment of a referee pursuant to the judicial reference provision (provision or reference provision) in the agreements; the trial court granted the motion and appointed a referee.

Defendants seek writ relief from the order granting plaintiff’s motion to compel judicial reference. They argue (1) the reference provision does not waive their right to a jury trial because they did not have “actual notice of, and did not engage in meaningful reflection before agreeing to, the purported waiver”; (2) the reference provision is unconscionable, and therefore unenforceable; (3) plaintiff waived its right to reference; and (4) the court abused its discretion by granting the reference motion because reference will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.