Benitez

Benitez v. Williams

Good Law
162 Cal. Rptr. 3d 26·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 696·219 Cal. App. 4th 270·2013 WL 4654516
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2013B242512California2,179 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kitching, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff David Erik Benitez appeals an order of dismissal of his second amended complaint (SAC) against defendants Ross Leveme Williams (Ross) and Devon Williams (Devon). The SAC set forth a copyright infringement cause of action and various state law claims. The superior court ordered plaintiff to “remove” the suit to federal court and, when plaintiff did not do so, dismissed the SAC.

The court’s order of dismissal was based on two erroneous assumptions. The first was that Benitez could remove the case to federal court. Only a defendant, however, can file a notice of removal.

The superior court also assumed that plaintiff could not maintain concurrent state and federal actions arising out of the same facts and circumstances. Rather, the court concluded, plaintiff was required to litigate his entire lawsuit, including his state law claims, in federal court. This was error.

We conclude that the superior court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s copyright infringement cause of action was not a miscarriage of justice because the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over such claims. We further conclude, however, that the superior court’s dismissal of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.