Banuelos

Banuelos v. 218 Properties CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 2013B241645California3,096 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/3/13 Banuelos v. 218 Properties CA2/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ROSA BANUELOS, B241645

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TC024502) v.

218 PROPERTIES, LLC, et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

Allen J. Webster, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Office of Spix & Martin, Richard L. Spix and D. Elizabeth Martin for

Plaintiff and Appellant.

Law Offices of Douglas W. Beck & Associates and Douglas W. Beck; Klinedinst

and Gregory A. Garbacz for Defendants and Respondents, 218 Properties, LLC,

LA Investment, LLC, R22, Inc., dba Star Management and Peter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.