Evans Hotel, LLC v. Unite Here! Local 30
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EVANS HOTELS, LLC, et al. Case No.: 18-cv-2763-RSH-AHG
12 Plaintiffs,
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’
13 v. FEES
14 UNITE HERE! LOCAL 30, et al.
15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On April 3, 2025, the Court determined that Defendants were “prevailing parties” 19 within the meaning of California’s anti-SLAPP statute, California Code of Civil Procedure 20 § 425.16, and that Defendants were therefore entitled to recover attorneys’ fees. ECF No. 21 183 at 12.1 Given that the fee motion was filed years ago—prior to Defendants’ successful 22 cross-appeal of this Court’s denial of that motion—the Court invited supplemental briefing 23 24 25 26
27 1 The Court’s prior order addresses the procedural history applicable to Defendants’ 28 1 on the amount of fees incurred. The Parties have filed their supplemental briefs. ECF Nos. 2 184, 185.2 3 Defendants seek to recover a total of $316,783, based on three categories: (1) time 4 spent briefing the anti-SLAPP…