Evans Hotel, LLC v. Unite Here! Local 30

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20253:18-cv-02763California2,916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EVANS HOTELS, LLC, et al. Case No.: 18-cv-2763-RSH-AHG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’

v. FEES

UNITE HERE! LOCAL 30, et al.

Defendants. 16 17 On April 3, 2025, the Court determined that Defendants were “prevailing parties” within the meaning of California’s anti-SLAPP statute, California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16, and that Defendants were therefore entitled to recover attorneys’ fees. ECF No. 183 at 12.1 Given that the fee motion was filed years ago—prior to Defendants’ successful cross-appeal of this Court’s denial of that motion—the Court invited supplemental briefing 23 24 25

27 The Court’s prior order addresses the procedural history applicable to Defendants’ 28 on the amount of fees incurred. The Parties have filed their supplemental briefs. ECF Nos. 184, 185.2 Defendants seek to recover a total of $316,783, based on three categories: (1) time spent briefing the anti-SLAPP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.