Gordoa
Gordoa v. Apple, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CARLOS GORDOA, et al., Case No. 3:22-cv-02900-JSC
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
9 v. MOTIONS TO SEAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND DAUBERT
10 APPLE, INC., BRIEFING 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 198, 208, 213
12 13 In connection with the Apple’s motion for summary judgment and motion to exclude 14 Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Hahn, the parties filed several motions to seal. (Dkt. Nos. 198, 208, 213.) 15 This Order resolves those motions. 16 In considering motions to seal, courts recognize “a strong presumption in favor of access is 17 the starting point.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) 18 (cleaned up). Parties seeking to seal judicial records relating to motions such as this that are 19 “more than tangentially related to the underlying cause of action,” Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler 20 Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016), bear the burden of overcoming the presumption with 21 …