Gordoa

Gordoa v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20253:22-cv-02900California708 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLOS GORDOA, et al., Case No. 3:22-cv-02900-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE

v. MOTIONS TO SEAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND DAUBERT

APPLE, INC., BRIEFING Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 198, 208, 213

12 In connection with the Apple’s motion for summary judgment and motion to exclude Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Hahn, the parties filed several motions to seal. (Dkt. Nos. 198, 208, 213.) This Order resolves those motions. In considering motions to seal, courts recognize “a strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (cleaned up). Parties seeking to seal judicial records relating to motions such as this that are “more than tangentially related to the underlying cause of action,” Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016), bear the burden of overcoming the presumption with …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.