Dorotik

Dorotik v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20253:23-cv-01045California2,603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JANE DOROTIK, Case No.: 23-cv-1045-CAB-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

IN CAMERA REVIEW OF

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

INTERNAL AFFAIRS DOCUMENTS

12 Defendants. [Dkt. No. 74]

15 Bef ore the Court is the parties’ joint motion for in camera review of Defendants Richard Empson, James Blackmon, Janet Ryzdynski, Connie Milton, and Bill Donohue’s Internal Affairs records. Dkt. No. 74. The parties ask the Court to resolve the County of San Diego’s general objections to producing Internal Affairs documents and then determine whether any of these records include sustained findings of “dishonesty, deception, failure to provide information or evidence, . . . fabrication, mishandling, or contamination of evidence, wrongful detention or arrest, illegal search, manipulation of eyewitness identifications, improper tactics during investigations, obstruction of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.