Dorotik

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JANE DOROTIK, Case No.: 23-cv-1045-CAB-DDL

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

10 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

IN CAMERA REVIEW OF

11 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

INTERNAL AFFAIRS DOCUMENTS

12 Defendants. [Dkt. No. 74] 13

14

15 16 Bef ore the Court is the parties’ joint motion for in camera review of Defendants 17 Richard Empson, James Blackmon, Janet Ryzdynski, Connie Milton, and Bill Donohue’s 18 Internal Affairs records. Dkt. No. 74. The parties ask the Court to resolve the County of 19 San Diego’s general objections to producing Internal Affairs documents and then 20 determine whether any of these records include sustained findings of “dishonesty, 21 deception, failure to provide information or evidence, . . . fabrication, mishandling, or 22 contamination of evidence, wrongful detention or arrest, illegal search, manipulation of 23 eyewitness identifications, improper tactics during investigations, obstruction of…