Valdez

Valdez v. Santa Cruz Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20253:25-cv-01369California363 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ISMAEL VALDEZ, S-264952, Case No. 25-cv-01369-CRB (PR)

8 Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

9 v. (ECF Nos. 2 & 5) 10 SANTA CRUZ SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 11 Respondent(s).

12 Petitioner Ismael Valdez, a pretrial detainee at the Santa Cruz County Jail facing various 13 state criminal charges in Santa Cruz County Superior Court, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of 14 habeas corpus seeking the dismissal of the state criminal proceedings against him on grounds of 15 police misconduct. Petitioner also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. 16 § 1915. 17 Petitioner may challenge his pretrial detention on state criminal charges by way of a 18 petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. But principles of comity and 19 federalism require that this court abstain and not entertain any such pre-sentence habeas challenge 20 unless petitioner shows that: (1) he has exhausted available state judicial remedies,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.