Sandisk Technologies, Inc. v. Viasat, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20254:22-cv-04376California4,735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 SANDISK3D IP HOLDINGS LTD., et al., Case No. 22-cv-04376-HSG (PHK)

Plaintiffs, ORDERS DENYING PLAINTIFF

SANDISK’S MOTION TO STRIKE

v. INTERROGATORY RESPONSES;

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

VIASAT, INC., SHORTEN TIME AS MOOT;

GRANTING MOTIONS TO SEAL

Defendant. Re: Dkts. 167, 168, 171, 177, and 178 13 On February 14, 2025, all discovery in this matter, including the motions at Dkt. 168 and 171, between Plaintiff SanDisk Technologies, Inc. (“SanDisk”) and Defendant Viasat, Inc. (“Viasat”) was referred to the undersigned. [Dkt. 173]. Now before the Court is SanDisk’s Motion to Strike Viasat’s Third Supplemental Response to Interrogatory No. 8 and Second Supplemental Response to Interrogatory No. 14, along with a Motion to Shorten Time for briefing and hearing on the instant Motion to Strike. [Dkts. 168 and 171]. Additionally, the Parties both filed Motions to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.