Sandisk Technologies, Inc. v. Viasat, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20254:22-cv-04376California4,735 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 SANDISK3D IP HOLDINGS LTD., et al., Case No. 22-cv-04376-HSG (PHK)

9 Plaintiffs, ORDERS DENYING PLAINTIFF

SANDISK’S MOTION TO STRIKE

10 v. INTERROGATORY RESPONSES;

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

11 VIASAT, INC., SHORTEN TIME AS MOOT;

GRANTING MOTIONS TO SEAL

12 Defendant. Re: Dkts. 167, 168, 171, 177, and 178 13 14 On February 14, 2025, all discovery in this matter, including the motions at Dkt. 168 and 15 171, between Plaintiff SanDisk Technologies, Inc. (“SanDisk”) and Defendant Viasat, Inc. 16 (“Viasat”) was referred to the undersigned. [Dkt. 173]. Now before the Court is SanDisk’s Motion 17 to Strike Viasat’s Third Supplemental Response to Interrogatory No. 8 and Second Supplemental 18 Response to Interrogatory No. 14, along with a Motion to Shorten Time for briefing and hearing on 19 the instant Motion to Strike. [Dkts. 168 and 171]. Additionally, the Parties both filed Motions to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.