(PC) Carroll v. State of California

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TREMAINE CARROLL, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00627 JLT EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE

13 v. TO PAY THE FILING FEE 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., (Doc. 11) 15 Defendants. 16 17 On February 27, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee for this action 18 within 30 days. (Doc. 11.) Despite the Court’s warning that failure to comply with the order 19 would result in dismissal (id. at 3), Plaintiff failed to pay the required filing fees. Without such 20 payment, the action cannot proceed before the Court. See Saddozai v. Davis, 35 F.4th 705, 709 21 (9th Cir. 2022). 22 Plaintiff objected to the Court’s order, asserting that she received it late because “CDCR is 23 circumventing [Plaintiff’s] due process rights.” (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff also states that she is “in 24 dispute with two law firms that are supposed to be representing her and should have been doing 25 so in this matter.” (Id.)…