Aldridge

Aldridge v. Future Motion, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20255:25-cv-03666California362 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: FUTURE MOTION, INC. PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3087

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -29)

On December 8, 2023, the Panel transferred 28 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 709 F.Supp.3d 1394 (J.P.M.L. 2023). Since that time, 58 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Freeman. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.