Campbell

(PC) Drake v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20251:24-cv-00651California4,077 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARL DAVID DRAKE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00651-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION CAMPBELL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

Defendant. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDERS, AND FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE (ECF Nos. 11, 13) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 I. Background Plaintiff Earl David Drake (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 3, 2025, the Court screened the first amended complaint and found that it failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 11.) The Court issued an order granting Plaintiff leave to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.