Campbell
(PC) Drake v. Campbell
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20251:24-cv-00651California4,077 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARL DAVID DRAKE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00651-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
v. ACTION CAMPBELL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR
Defendant. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE
TO OBEY COURT ORDERS, AND FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE (ECF Nos. 11, 13) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 I. Background Plaintiff Earl David Drake (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 3, 2025, the Court screened the first amended complaint and found that it failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 11.) The Court issued an order granting Plaintiff leave to file a…