Campbell
(PC) Drake v. Campbell
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARL DAVID DRAKE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00651-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
13 v. ACTION 14 CAMPBELL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR
15 Defendant. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE
TO OBEY COURT ORDERS, AND FAILURE
16 TO PROSECUTE 17 (ECF Nos. 11, 13) 18 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 20 I. Background 21 Plaintiff Earl David Drake (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 22 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 23 On February 3, 2025, the Court screened the first amended complaint and found that it 24 failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim for 25 relief. (ECF No. 11.) The Court issued an order granting Plaintiff leave to file a…