Jazi

Jazi v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20253:25-cv-00027California2,942 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Bahman Sharifian Jazi and Pouya Sharifian Jazi filed suit against U.S. 21 Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other government officials. Before the Court is 22 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. After considering the papers submitted, supporting 23 documentation, and applicable law, the Court grants the Motion to Dismiss. 24 25

II. BACKGROUND

This case arises from the Government’s processing of a Form I-130 alien relative 26 immigration visa. 27 28 1 A. Statement of Relevant Facts 2 Bahman Jazi is a lawful permanent resident of the United States and a citizen of 3 Iran. Bahram Jazi returned to the United States in November 2024, after spending the 4 last five years in Iran. Pouya Jazi is an Iranian national who is a software engineer 5 residing in Iran. Bahman Jazi is the father of Pouya Jazi. 6 B. Procedural History 7 Bahman Jazi filed an I-130 application for the benefit of Pouya Jazi on May 9, 8 2020. Pouya Jazi appeared for a visa interview at the U.S. Embassy in Yerevan, 9 Armenia, on November 6, 2023. The same day the consular officer refused the visa 10 application under INA §221(g), 8 U.S.C. §1201(g). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.