Underwood

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 LARRY UNDERWOOD; JOYCE Case No.: 25cv120 BEN (DDL)

AGIOBENEBO,

13

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, 14 DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. 15

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HUMAN

16 [Dkt. Nos. 3, 8, 10]

SERVICES AGENCY, ET AL,

17 Defendants. 18

19 Now before the Court is the motion of the County of San Diego to dismiss the 20 Complaint. The County asserts, inter alia, that this Court lacks subject matter 21 jurisdiction. The Court agrees. 22 In their Complaint, it is alleged that Plaintiffs were parents of a minor child. A 23 juvenile dependency action was initiated and adjudicated in proceedings before a juvenile 24 dependency court of the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Plaintiffs’ 25 prayer for relief seeks $150,000,000 in damages and an order from this Court ordering 26 that their child be returned to their custody and the child’s birth certificate amended. 27 28 1 The Rooker-Feldman doctrine relieves a federal court of subject matter…