Jane Roe LB 61 v. DOE 1

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20258:24-cv-02406California1,903 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANE ROE LB 61, Case No. 8:24-cv-02406-JWH-ADS

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. MOTION TO REMAND [ECF No. 11] 14 DOE 1, a corporation; DOE 2, a corporation; 15 DOE 3, an entity of unknown form; and DOES 4 to 100, inclusive. 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Jane Roe LB 61 (“‘Roe”’) for an 2|| order remanding this action to Orange County Superior Court. The Court |) concludes that this matter is appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See 4|| Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. After considering the papers filed in support and in opposition,” the Court orders that the Motion is DENIED, as set forth herein. 6 I. BACKGROUND 7 This action arises out of alleged sexual abuse of a minor by a leader of the & || Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.* Roe filed her complaint in Orange 9|| County Superior Court in August 2024, alleging six state law causes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.