Carlsen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SORAYA MARIA RIGOR, Case No. 2:23-cv-0774-DC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DALE CARLSEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff brings this action against defendants Dale Carlsen, Robert Nelsen, Frank Bisek, and Jyoti Das, all employees of California State University, Sacramento. The complaint is too vague to raise a cognizable claim against any defendant and is non-compliant with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I will therefore dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. I will also grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is…