(PC) Watts v. County of Colusa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20252:24-cv-00957California214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 QUINTON WATTS, No. 2:24-cv-00957-DAD-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, 1] v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE COUNTY OF COLUSA, Defendants. 14 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action. ECF No. 1. On January 27, 16 || 2025, the court granted plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and directed plaintiff 17 || to file, within 21 days, either an amended complaint or a statement of intent to proceed on the 18 || original complaint. ECF No. 13. The 21-day period has elapsed, and plaintiff has not responded 19 || to the order. “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the court.” Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 22 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that, within 30 days of the date of this 23 || order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.