(PC) Watts v. County of Colusa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20252:24-cv-00957California214 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 QUINTON WATTS, No. 2:24-cv-00957-DAD-EFB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, 1] v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 12 COUNTY OF COLUSA, 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action. ECF No. 1. On January 27, 16 || 2025, the court granted plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and directed plaintiff 17 || to file, within 21 days, either an amended complaint or a statement of intent to proceed on the 18 || original complaint. ECF No. 13. The 21-day period has elapsed, and plaintiff has not responded 19 || to the order. 20 “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the district court may dismiss an 21 | action for failure to comply with any order of the court.” Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 22 | (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that, within 30 days of the date of this 23 || order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.