(HC) Adamik v. San Joaquin County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20252:24-cv-01889California808 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NICOLE M. ADAMIK, No. 2:24-cv-01889-DAD-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

14 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SUPERIOR HABEAS PETITION DUE TO COURT, et al., PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 15 AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT Respondents. ORDERS 16 (Doc. No. 6) 17

18 19 Petitioner Nicole M. Adamik is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a petition for 20 writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United 21 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On June 24, 2024, petitioner filed the petition initiating this action. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2.) On 23 July 18, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge ordered petitioner to complete an in forma pauperis 24 application or pay the required filing fee within thirty days. (Doc. No. 4.) Petitioner did not 25 respond to the court’s order. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.